Dean N. Browning What is the Tea Party Brand: Earl Grey or Herbal?
Posted on November 3, 2011 at 2:27pm Print &nbps;0 Comments ‹ Back to Blog Post File Photo: Members of Lehigh Valley Project 9-12/Tea Party Group listen to chairman Mat Benol. Credit Christina Georgiou Photos Pdfs Add your photos One of the more important and consequential developments on the political scene has been the emergence of the “Tea Party” as an active voice in the formation of public policy.
Locally we have a large and engaged group organized as the Lehigh Valley Project 9-12 Tea Party Group (LVTP).
I’ve attended several of LVTP meetings, participated in their candidate’s forum, and I frequently visit their website to follow the topics being discussed by their 500-plus members.
Overall, my observation is that the LVTP consists of ordinary citizens who are concerned about the direction of our country. They want to get involved in the political process, many for the first time, in order to have a say in that direction. While much of their focus is on Washington and national issues, the LVTP is also active at the local level. The group has members who are welcome constructive additions to the small number of citizens that regularly attend meetings of local governments such as school boards or county council.
In addition, the LVTP took the step early last year of formulating and adopting a Limited Government Resolution (a copy is attached) to be used as a yard stick in measuring elected officials at the national, state and local level.
I was (and still am) supportive of the major objectives of the Resolution. However, before it was adopted, I had questions about the apparent conflict among certain provisions or about how others would be implemented.
For example, the Resolution has as one of its goals the laudable objective of no increase in taxes. But the Resolution also allows spending to increase at the rate of inflation combined with the growth in population. Unresolved is the question of how these two goals would apply to government entities (such as school districts) where spending is driven by inflation and population growth but the supporting tax revenue (primarily real estate property taxes) is not impacted at all by inflation and may not be directly correlated to population growth.
Another example is the goal that existing debt can only be refinanced if it reduces the total debt obligation. Taken at face value that would mean the typical refinancing approach of keeping the debt the same but getting a substantially lower interest rate would not be an option.
Nonetheless, the LVTP considered a draft of that Resolution at two separate meetings early in 2010. Minutes from the second meeting record that the presentation of the Resolution was met with several standing ovations and was subsequently approved by a unanimous vote.
One of the listed goals of the Resolution is the elimination of operating deficits in government budgets. A detailed handout provided with the Resolution defines an operating deficit as one where spending exceeds money received. That is fairly straight forward and easy to follow. And eliminating deficits is something every government, especially the federal government, should have as a requirement.
As a result, I was surprised at the approach the LVTP took in the approval process for Lehigh County’s budget for 2012, given the salience of deficit spending to them and to their Resolution.
In early October, the Lehigh County Board of Commissioners considered a series of amendments to the 2012 budget. The amendments were developed by several candidates running for the Board of Commissioners and then presented by a current member of the Board.
The purpose of the amendments was to decrease the budgeted millage rate from 11.90 mils to 10.64 mils for 2012. As desirable as lower taxes are, the amendments failed to address any of the corresponding spending cuts needed to sustain the reduction. As a result, the net effect was that budgeted spending would have remained at $109 million for 2012 while budgeted revenue would have dropped to $94 million, thus creating a $15 million deficit for the year.
The rationale for this was that it would “inject money” into the Lehigh County’ economy. If President Obama’s trillion dollar deficit stimulus did little to help the U.S. economy, I’m certain a $15 million deficit would have much the same effect on Lehigh County’s $40 billion economy.
Oddly enough, a number of Tea Party members were in attendance when the amendments were discussed, and no one voiced any opposition or commented on the proposal to create a sizeable deficit for 2012. On the contrary, there were several who were in favor of the plan.
The LVTP has made great strides to become involved and engaged in the political process. One of their underlying themes is that governments are limited to the powers specified and enumerated in documents ranging from the U.S. Constitution to the Home Rule Charter for Lehigh County.
Viewed another way, I think the LVTP believes words mean what they say. Too bad the LVTP didn’t take that same position when their Limited Government Resolution had its first local test.
Today I had a conservation with Thomas Slonaker the Lehigh County Controller. He was upset about my comments, in regard to his attendance, at the County Commissioners Meeting (candidates) before the Primary last spring.
In all fairness, I can only report on the times, I personally saw him at a meeting. He may have been at other meetings, when I was not aware of his presence. To make this very simple I only heard him speak twice at any meetings. Please don't take these comments as an retraction of my previous statements. This is just a clarification. I only report the facts as I see them. I don't make things up to suit my purpose. My comments are a result of my being at the meetings and what I saw or heard.
County Commissioners Meeting 10/12/2011
Bill 2011-69 Adopting the 2012 Lehigh County Budget and Amending the Job Classification and Pay Plans for Consistency with 2012 Budget.
Commissioner Echart proposed 2 Amendments to the Budget, both of which would return additional monies to the tax payers and reduce the Millage rate. However the Administration wants to increase the amount of money the County has in reserve from 19 Million to 25 Million. On both of these amendments the vote was as follows.
Yes: Tom Creighton, Percy Dougherty,Glenn Echart,Andy Roman. All Republicans
No: Gloria Hamm,William Hensell,David Jones,Danial McCarthy. All Democrats
The deciding vote reminded me of last years Budget Vote, when taxes were increased 16%.
Dean Browning voted No again.
Tonight the Lehigh County Commissioners had their first reading of Bill 2011-55.
This is a pass through Subgrant from the State to St. Luke's Hospital for 7 Million dollars. This money is for the building of a parking garage to increase their parking.This is presented as a matching Grant. However the parking garage will cost 7 million and their match will be completing the 5th floor of their building. I would like to thank everyone in the rest of the State for their contribution to Lehigh County and the City of Allentown.
I believe that if St.Like's Hospital need more parking, they should build it themselves.
I suspect that what we thought SB1 would be, will not come to pass. For the most part I think it will either be watered down to nothing or go away completely.
We have a Republican State House and Senate with a Republican Governor and we still can't get SB1 passed. Why, because we have too many politicians that get too much money from the Teachers Union. Both Republicans and Democrats. They are afraid of the Teachers Union, just as they are afraid to pass a "Right to Work" law for fear of losing funding from the other Unions.
The Teachers Union is against SB1. I suspect that they are afraid of competition, and will fight anything that might show, that our present system is in need of reform. God forbid that a failing student in a failing school may find a way to get in a good school and succeed.